Brennan’s Potential Perjury Exposed: A Major Development in the Russia Hoax Saga
John Brennan, the former CIA Director, may soon be facing serious legal consequences, including potential perjury charges. This follows the declassification of a damning internal review by current CIA Director John Ratcliffe, which reveals the corrupt underpinnings of the “Intelligence Community Assessment” (ICA) regarding Russian interference in the 2016 election.
Last week, Ratcliffe bravely declassified the CIA’s internal findings on the ICA, which has drawn intense scrutiny. He asserted, “[President Donald Trump] has trusted me with helping to end the weaponization of US intelligence,” shedding light on the politically charged environment during Brennan’s tenure. It is clear that the assessment was marred by partisan agendas, spearheaded by Brennan and former FBI Director James Comey.
For years, Republicans and Trump supporters have maintained that the ICA relied heavily on the dubious Christopher Steele Dossier, a document riddled with blatant falsehoods, including the infamous “pee tape” claims. It’s also worth noting that the Clinton campaign, which funded the Dossier, had to pay a hefty fine for failing to accurately disclose its financial dealings during the investigation by the Federal Election Commission.
The fact that career intelligence officers have corroborated Republican claims about the deeply flawed ICA is monumental. Ratcliffe has been instrumental in exposing the truth, stating, “All the world can now see the truth: Brennan, Clapper, and Comey manipulated intelligence… all to get Trump.”
However, the revelations don’t stop there. Sources have indicated that the review contains potential evidence suggesting that Brennan may have perjured himself during his closed-door testimony to Congress. According to page 5 of the newly released review, Brennan disregarded warnings from seasoned CIA professionals and insisted on including the Steele Dossier in the ICA. This contradicts his previous claims to Congress that he did not advocate for its inclusion.
One congressional source remarked on Ratcliffe’s achievement in getting career CIA officials to expose Brennan’s misconduct. The implications of this are enormous; the Department of Justice should take note and be prepared for serious ramifications. Brennan’s actions not only jeopardized the integrity of the CIA but also directly impacted our democracy.
Brennan’s previous public statements about the dossier, asserting he hadn’t read it and didn’t give it credence, are now in direct conflict with the findings presented by Ratcliffe. His inconsistent claims raise substantial questions about his credibility — questions that could lead to serious legal repercussions.
Former CIA officer Bryan Dean-Wright didn’t hold back, asserting that Brennan “should rot in prison.” The ramifications of this are profound, as the Justice Department cannot ignore the potential for legal action based on Brennan’s contradictory statements.
Given Ratcliffe’s relentless pursuit of the truth, it is clear that the investigation into Brennan’s actions is far from over. His prior disclosures during his directorship highlight the lengths to which some operatives in the Obama administration went to undermine Trump’s presidency. The American people deserve accountability, and Brennan’s time may soon be up.
