Billionaire Timothy Mellon just made headlines by stepping up for our troops in a time of dire need. He became the anonymous benefactor who generously donated a staggering $130 million to the U.S. government to ensure our military personnel are paid during the shutdown. Meanwhile, Mark Cuban—who’s wealthier than Mellon—hasn’t opened his wallet for Ukraine despite claiming a personal connection to the conflict.
President Donald Trump made this monumental announcement, calling Mellon a “patriot” who values our military and country. Mellon’s gesture is not just notable; it’s a proud declaration of support that outshines many wealthy figures in America today.
“He called us the other day and he said, ‘I’d like to contribute any shortfall you have because of the Democrat shutdown. I love the military and I love the country…’”
“He doesn’t want the recognition… but he gave us a check for $130 million, which is going to go to the military.” – Trump
This altruism has already been downplayed by the NY Times, which aims to undermine this act of charity. It’s typical—the left can’t stand when a conservative makes waves for all the right reasons.
Mellon is no stranger to philanthropy, having previously funneled tens of millions into groups supporting Trump and the Republican party. Last year alone, he contributed $50 million to a Trump super PAC, marking one of the largest donations in political history.
Additionally, he is backing Robert F. Kennedy Jr.’s presidential campaign and his organization, Children’s Health Defense, demonstrating a commitment to conservative causes across the board.
The Pentagon confirmed they accepted Mellon’s donation to cover service members’ salaries and benefits, adhering to established protocol for such large contributions. Pentagon spokesperson Sean Parnell stated, “This was made on the condition that it be used to offset the cost of service members’ salaries and benefits.”
THE NY TIMES IS NOT HAPPY
In typical fashion, the NY Times tries to cast a shadow on this noble act, subtly hinting it could be against the Antideficiency Act. It’s a curious position when—over the past six years—this act has been skirted in similar situations without consequence.
“The donation appears to be a potential violation of the Antideficiency Act, which prohibits federal agencies from spending money in excess of congressional appropriations…”
But let’s be real: this is an unfounded fear. Similar situations have occurred over 80 times from 2018-2024 without prosecution. So, will the left actually put their money where their mouth is and challenge this in court? We highly doubt it.
