Helen Andrews has unleashed a powerful critique of feminism, laying bare its detrimental effects on society in her groundbreaking article. This is not just another think piece; it’s a clarion call that has been hailed by influential voices as one of the most important journalistic contributions in years.
In her incisive work titled “The Great Feminization,” Andrews argues that the insidious rise of cancel culture can be directly linked to a demographic shift in our institutions. She asserts, “Cancel culture is simply what women do whenever there are enough of them in a given organization or field.” This is the essence of her bold thesis: what many term ‘wokeness’ is merely an expression of feminine behavioral norms infiltrating spaces that were traditionally male-dominated.
Andrews provocatively states, “Wokeness is not a new ideology, an outgrowth of Marxism, or a result of post-Obama disillusionment. It embodies feminine patterns of behavior.” This unapologetic stance pricks the bubble of conventional thinking, challenging the notion that gender equality resulted in uniformity of thought and behavior in the workplace.
Consider the facts: Women made up the majority of the college-educated workforce starting in 2019 and have since taken over as the majority of college instructors by 2023. Andrews notes that this demographic shift coincides with the radical rise of ‘wokeness’ as institutions transition from being male-centric to female-controlled.
She draws a compelling distinction between masculine and feminine approaches to conflict. Men confront issues head-on, while women, according to Andrews, tend to undermine rivals through covert tactics. This insight is crucial; it highlights the underlying patterns that dictate behavior within our most influential organizations.
Jason Whitlock echoes this sentiment, emphasizing that societal denial about gender differences has led us astray. He asserts that the idea of treating women and men as entirely the same is not just misguided, it is harmful to our national discourse.
Chad Jackson offers a nuanced critique, suggesting that while Andrews makes valid points, her perspective still leans into a form of feminism. He contends that the rise of wokeness is not a recent phenomenon but rather a symptom of centuries-old cultural shifts.
The conversation is clear: feminism, as presented in its modern form, has changed the very fabric of our society. We must unflinchingly analyze these patterns and their impact on our fundamental institutions. Changing the narrative starts with embracing these realities and confidently addressing the truths they reveal.
