New York City is at a critical crossroads, and swaggering socialist candidate Zohran Mamdani is leading the charge toward a radical reshaping of public safety. During a recent debate, he boldly stated that mental health experts should take the lead in crisis situations, a position that raises serious concerns about his understanding of urban safety and law enforcement.

Mamdani’s plan for public safety revolves around a radical transformation of the NYPD, dismissing the efficacy of traditional law enforcement methods. He claims he would retain Police Commissioner Jessica Tisch, promising to pursue “safety and affordability.” But let’s be real; his rhetoric is steeped in contradictions. He simultaneously touts the need for a “Department of Community Safety,” implying that professionals with no law enforcement experience should handle situations that often require immediate police intervention.

His past statements reveal an alarming belief that police presence only exacerbates issues like domestic violence. He has stated that situations like these should be managed by non-law enforcement figures—a dangerously naïve perspective that could lead to increased chaos in New York’s streets.

Republican candidate Curtis Sliwa countered Mamdani’s assertions, predicting that Tisch would be unwilling to work under a mayor who supports the dangerous principles of “no cash bail.” Sliwa is correct; this new brand of leadership encourages criminals, rather than ensuring the safety of law-abiding citizens.

Former Governor Andrew Cuomo also chimed in, highlighting Mamdani’s association with a radical agenda that seeks to diminish the police force’s role in keeping New Yorkers safe. He pointed out that Mamdani’s party has consistently pushed for defunding the police, a move that would directly undermine public safety efforts.

It’s crystal clear: Mamdani’s approach to governing is more about embracing a failed ideology than ensuring security for every New Yorker. With the election approaching on November 4, 2025, it’s time for voters to reject these radical ideas and demand accountability and safety from their leaders. Only a firm, law-and-order approach can restore confidence in New York City.